Login Password

Today, the 20th of May 2012

Legal Environment

General definitions of fraud for a company and executive management


Some International definitions

…Fraud is an intentional deception made for personal/company gain or to damage another individual/company; Fraud is a crime, and a civil law violation…

Definition ACFE (Association of Certified Fraud Examiners):

The internal fraud is the use of one’s own activity in order to enrich themselves while abusing or deliberately diverting resources and assets of the company

Types of Risk:

A legal and operational risk that may cause the company to lose on a financial, material, or brand. An origin often related to identity. The confidential data is becoming a prime target and controls on operational risks is now a priority in corporate governance. Internal and external assets of the company (70% internal 20% external links - collusion), the stakes are potentially enormous, affecting all sectors, particularly because of:

•The industrialization of organized financed crime.

•Specialty groups and a structured market (RBN, ...)

•From a high level of sophistication, "cyber war", using new approaches (virtual worlds, social networks,…)

•Through a strategic approach as the destabilization of societies (Pay Pal vs CastleCops, antivirus)

•A presence at all levels of the company,

•An ongoing activity. 24 - 7 -365. Law and Regulations

•Sarbanes-Oxley Act of July 2002. Formalizing internal procedures and financial accounting.

•Section 404 (process approach)

•ELCA - Global Device Fraud - Risk Assessment (Unit Level)

•Financial Security Act 01 August 2003. It strengthened the role of Internal Audit, modernized the Supervisors and the regulation of insurance, credit institutions, investment firms, security of depositors and policyholders, the modernization of auditing and transparency accounts.

•ISA 240. International standard requiring auditors to conduct interviews on the topic of fraud.

•Recommendations of the CMAA rCBF 97-02 and BASEL 2 (Banks). Created by Act No. 2003-706 of 1 August 2003 Security Financil Supervisory Authority of Insurance and Mutual (CAMA) is an independent statutory authority with legal personality.

•Decree of 13 March 2006. Definition of section 336-1 of the Insurance Code on internal control requirements if using a public offering.

•SOLVENCY II. Including the three pillars frame the financial risks on insurance agencies (quantitative financial requirements, strengthened Internal Control Functions, procedures and information disclosure to the supervisory authorities).

•IFR standards

•Eighth European Directive on auditing. The Directive (No. 2006/43/EC) of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts. It aims to harmonize highly but not completely requirements for statutory audit.


In France:

In difficult economic times faced with increasing cases against Senior Managers, starting the 11 June 2003, strengthened by the decision of the 2nd Chamber of the Court of Appeal of Aix en Provence on March 13, 2006 Case ESCOTA / Lucent Technologies that establishes the principle of responsibility that induced the General Manager for the actions of his employees.

Judges have applied Article 1384 of the Civil Code concerning persons liability "to whom employees report”, and more specifically its paragraph 5, noting that "the site (the subject of crime) has been disputed performed on the workplace through the facilities provided by the company."

 

"The employers are liable as principal for their employees and for any acts committed by them in their internet use during working hours, on the basis of paragraph 5 of Article 1384 Civil Code." The company and its manager were found jointly with the employee to heavy fines.

 

These decisions of jurisprudence marking the conditions for such liability are rare and difficult to enforce. Therefore it becomes necessary for legislator to know the activation and best practices in use.

 

Definition of the French Penal Code (Criminal).

"Commission of an act, intentional fraudulent tactics that gives undue or illegal advantage. Internal or external breach of an obligation (whether in contract or tort) with the intent to harm and to benefit directly or indirectly, may be the result of its author or a result of induced chain of responsibility ".

The corporate fraud takes different forms. Internal and external, it focuses mainly on the misappropriation of assets, handling of information or picture and the hijacking of production of the company. It is characterized by isolated acts or repeated by the fact of an individual and / or group. It extends over short or extended periods.

 

"The fight against fraud is to control legal risk materialized by facts that could be described as crimes of theft, embezzlement, fraud, corruption, money laundering, false documents, fakery and forgery... and that can generate for the company financial, material or image risk,... " .../..." In cases of proven fraud, the penalty applies to the fraudster, but can also apply to the company and its executives, including lack of vigilance in the implementation of an anti-fraud adapted protection system...”

 

Notes on the materiality of the fraud:

The reality of fraud and its method of proof involves several legal requirements and its realization is often complex. The combination of the accounting, financial, current and fixed assets and intentional fraudulent and beneficial elements are the all the gears required of professional analysis procedures.

 

Internal Fraud, Penal Code definition:

The fraud includes all the malicious and dishonest acts under the Criminal Code and that cause injury that is purely financial. Besides, it is about false documents, fakery and forgery, theft uncharacterized parts of extortion, embezzlement of wages, abuse in blank, abuse of confidence and finally computer fraud.

Articles:

The articles of the French (Criminal) Penal Code 121-7, 311-1 to 6, 313-1 to 3 to 4 314-1, 321-1 to 7 to 11 define 441-1 theft, concealment, fraud, the abuse of confidence, infringement of the automated processing of data and forgery.

 

Some types of fraud

 

Presentation of inaccurate/false accounts. Art. L246-6 al 2 al 3 L24-3 of the Commercial Law Code

Distribution of fictitious dividends. Art. 242-6 al 1 and L241-3 part 2 of the Commercial Law Code

False documents, fakery and forgery. Art. 441-1 of the Penal (Criminal) Code

Vol. Art 311-1 of the Penal Code

Abuse of social goods. Art. L242-6 al 3 and 4, Art. L241-4 and 5 s. 2 of the Code of Commerce

Abuse of trust. Art. L341-1 of the Penal Code

Romance Fraud. Art. 313-1 of the Penal Code

 

Responsibilities induced.

The induced “de jure” and “de facto” responsibility of the Manager can be hired for virtually all types of crimes or civil wrongs and criminal. Some items pose a clear principle.

 

Employer's Liability, as principal of its employees for acts committed by them in their use of resources of the company during working hours. Art. 1384 s. 5 of the Civil Code.

 

Breach of security of persons and property of the company. Art. 226-17 of the Penal Code (Law 06/01/1978 DATA CENTER OF FILES AND FREEDOMS, Art. 42). Data confidentiality and professional secrecy. Art. 1384 al 9 and 1 of the Civil Code and 226-13 of the Penal Code.

 

Standards and regulations

Law and Regulations:

•Law of Daily Security 15/11/01. Information providers.

•CNIL Act 78.

•Confidence Law in the digital economy 21/06/04 (assured 78).

•HADOPI. Authorship and internet 12/06/09. Decision of the French Constitutional Council of the Universal Law of Internet Access. The Constitutional Council gave its decision1 on HADOPI 2, the legislative patch proposed by the French government in order to circumvent the Council's refusal of the core provisions of HADOPI 1

•Act on the principle of proportionality of 31/12/92 (amended Art L120-2 of the Labor Code).

•Act No. 78-17 of January 6, 1978 DITE FOYER RELATIVE A L'INFORMATIQUE, AUX FICHIERS ET AUX LIBERTES.

•Act No. 78-17 of 6 January 1978 relating to data, files and freedoms consolidated version corrected to May 14, 2009.

•CIP 240. Adapts ISA 240 and SAS 99 in the regulation and procedures of French Law. "TAKING ACCOUNT OF THE POSSIBILITY OF FRAUD UPON THE AUDIT OF ACCOUNTS" necessary for certification without qualification or compliance with statutory and consolidated. Standard approved by order of April 10, 2007 published in OJ No. 103 of May 03, 2007

     

Traditional methodologies of risk analysis applicable to fraud

MIRIS: Mastering Internal Risk and Safety

MEHARI (Méthode Harmonisée d'Analyse de Risques — Harmonised Risk Analysis Method) French Computer Security Club.

COSO/COSO 2 Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the tradeway commission

CNCC. Compagnie Nationale des Commissaires Aux Comptes. National Company of Accounts Auditors.  2301. Paragraph 08. July 2003